October 28, 2005
Thursday August 04th 2005, 11:02 am
Filed under: Free Speech?
If this isn’t a landmark internet free speech case, what is?
The Sheriff’s Department in
According to the suit, participants in the Hillsborough
County forum made derogatory comments about women, members of various
ethnic groups — and sheriff
The Sheriff’s Department says the suit isn’t sour grapes — it’s a genuine
attempt to determine if there are any “loose cannons” in the department.
Through the lawsuit, the sheriff’s office is making moves to identify the
anonymous deputies. Should they be identified, Docobo
said, they will be disciplined, up to and including termination.
Sheriff
“It is totally unprofessional for law enforcement officers to make those
kinds of postings,'’ Gee said. “It makes me wonder if they should have badges,
and I want to find out who they are.'’
[…]
Marc Rotenberg, director of the
“It sounds like the [sheriff’s office] is trying to send a pretty important
message to its internal staff that if they are doing this, they better stop,'’
Rotenberg said.
Still, Rotenberg said, anyone who thinks he is a victim of defamation has
rights.
“There is a fine line between whistleblower and online defamation,'’ he
said.
When an employer wants to stop disgruntled employees from posting online
criticisms, it can go to the Internet service provider with a subpoena for the
names of the anonymous chat room aficionados, Rotenberg said. Case law,
however, has come down to say that employers should not use subpoenas in a
fishing expedition to catch wayward employees, he said.
Lawyers for the department plan to subpoena leoaffairs.com in order to
obtain users’ IP addresses. Jim Preston, a former police officer and founder of
Leoaffairs, says he will not supply that information
to the department. “If someone posts anonymously,'’ he said, “it’s because they
want to protect their identity.'’
Meanwhile, a member of the
The current posts, containing outraged howls of unfairness, claims of
violation of civil rights, and false appeals to
nonexistent freedom of speech rights has driven our reliable, sensible and
reasonable posters off the board.
Where are posts by the reliable, logical, honest and down to earth posters
like St. Michael, Deacon, Vigilante, Doc Holliday and the half-dozen or so
courageous souls, both still serving and retired, who post using their real
names? Well, Vigilante did post, but was immediately attacked by people
accusing him of trying to be “God” or “Jesus” and asking which Supreme Court he
served on. (This is typical name calling from the ignorant and illogical among
us for whom truth has no impact.) All of this for simply reciting demonstrably
true information - not opinion, information. I don’t blame him for deciding not
to respond to such rabble rousing. I don’t blame the others for not wanting to
descend into this morass in which their only reward for posting will be abusive
attacks.
Undoubtedly, the general public will be visiting this board repeatedly for a
while. To those of you who are new to the board, be
aware that the garbage postings currently appearing are not representative of
many of the issue-oriented, logic-driven discussions which have appeared here
in the past.
A vocal minority of malcontent underachievers whose anonymous attacks on the
Sheriff and his staff have been a constant distraction on the board in the past
are, for present, overwhelming the board with their venomous spewings. It was not always this way.
The board will benefit if the Sheriff’s Office lawsuit results in
forcing posters to be more circumspect in their statements. It is possible
to criticize the operations and policies of the office without making racist,
sexist and untruthful remarks. Such postings would be neither subject to
criminal or civil court action nor to office disciplinary action.
Previous: China
Closing Market to Foreign Broadcasters || Home
|| Next: ABC
Banned in Russia
If he thinks he was libelled, he should have to
prove libel before the names of the anonymous posters are released.
Regarding racist and sexist remarks, he has no right to know who made those
remarks.
Comment by Eric Jaffa
08.04.05 @ 11:41
am
Leave a
comment
Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Your e-mail address is never
displayed. Basic HTML is allowed. Including more than one link makes you look
like a spammer and will cause your comment to be held in moderation.
Proudly powered by WordPress 1.5.2.
Design based on Borderline
Chaos (1.9).
© SpeakSpeak
News; all rights reserved.
Login
Syndicate entries using RSS
(Posts) or RSS (Comments).